The two attorneys write in the Wall Street Journal that "when we first articulated ObamaCare's fundamental constitutional flaws in these pages nearly two years ago, our objections were met with derision by the law's defenders. Those who have been following the unfolding litigation are no longer laughing." To read the full article aobut how "the government's lawyers keep changing their arguments as each one is exposed as constitutionally suspect" visit http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303714704576383443814815916.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop Tweet
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment