Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Defending Obama's Drone Policy Against Americans

From the Daily Caller:

We know that a lot of libertarian and progressive critics of a hawkish foreign policy believe that the only real threat to peace and security in this world is the United States, but if anyone thinks that al-Qaida is some kind of dissident political club — rather than a “terrorist organization engaged in constant plotting against the United States” — we’d like to see the research.

And if anyone thinks that this organization’s commitment to “engage in such attacks regularly to the extent it were able to do so” does not pose “an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States” and her just interests, we’d like to know why.

And if anyone thinks that apprehension and trial of these combatants in a “host nation [that] is unable or unwilling to suppress the threat posed by the individual” is feasible, we’d like to understand how.

And if anyone thinks that committing treason by being in a foreign country — as a member of the armed wing of an organization that Congress “has authorized the use of force” against — is a constitutionally-protected place to be, we’d like to get an explanation.

And if anyone thinks that being “a senior operational leader of the enemy forces who is actively engaged in planning operations to kill Americans” is too broad, we’d like entertain a more workable definition.

And if anyone think that the president does not have a constitutional duty to defend the citizens of the United States from attack, we’d like to hear that thought process.

And if anyone has a better solution, we’d like to hear that out too.

From the National Review's David French, "Yes the Military Can and Should Target American Members of Al Qaeda": http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/340008/yes-military-can-and-should-target-american-members-al-qaeda-david-french

Finally, international law professor Michael Lewis writes that drones constitute the best way to combat the Taliban, and argues that "after examining the alternatives, it is clear that drones remain the best option available to minimize the negative effects of the conflict on civilians while continuing to disrupt the Taliban and deny it control of territory in the tribal areas." http://www.northjersey.com/news/opinions/drones_020713.html?page=all

No comments:

Post a Comment