The
reading of the Miranda warnings to the Boston jihadist by a magistrate
who waltzed into the hospital with a public defender during the
interrogation led the bomber to immediately lawyer and clam up. FBI
sources indicate they were still in the midst of questioning that was
yielding valuable intelligence. They were surprised when their
interrogation was called off. I would remind anyone engaging
in histrionics over Miranda being delayed that the Miranda rights have
no significant support in the history of the privilege or in the
language of the Fifth Amendment. That which was devised in the Miranda
v. Arizona ruling has a judicially created "public safety exception"
allowing for questioning without the reading of rights. The precise
contours of that exemption remain undefined. If this contrived exception
to a now sacrosanct yet originally concocted rule is to exist, and the
Boston atrocity demonstrates that it should, the circumstances to which
it applies must be more clearly defined. There is no reason the DOJ
should be invoking it and then suddenly removing it while the FBI is
under the impression they are allowed more time to delay the made up
privilege.
Formally watering down an invented right in cases such as mass and
potentially international Islamist terrorism is not scandalous. It is
common sense.
Tweet
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Reading The Boston Bomber His Miranda Rights
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment